Saturday, September 26, 2009

Residency Requirement litigated in divorce case.

The Abood Law Firm appeared Friday, September 25, 2009, in Kent County to litigate an issue whether a 3-year-old judgment of divorce was void because the allegation in the complaint that the Defendant resided in Kent County was not true (according to the Defendant). The hearing began at approximately 9:45 and continued to almost 1:00pm. During the course of the presentation of evidence, the Defendant admitted that he had lied under oath in a prior proceeding regarding the issues before the Court. The Court permitted the parties to submit post closing briefs which are due Wednesday, September 30, 2009. Watch for future postings of the brief.

Labels:

This section of our website allows you to research some of our past cases, and keep up to date on current clients in the news. You can sort cases by category by selecting from the links below: